The Tax Behind the Canvas: What India’s Income-tax Law Means for Artists, Galleries and Collectors
By
Subathra Mylsamy
An artist sells a painting to a gallery, and the gallery sells it to a collector. Years later, the collector decides to sell it. Although the artwork has not changed, the tax consequences of these transactions can be quite different.
The Income-tax
Act, 2025, which came into force on 1 April 2026, provides the current
legislative framework. For artists, galleries and collectors, understanding how
the law applies to each transaction is an important part of managing the
financial side of art.
For the Artist: What Counts as Taxable Income?
When
an artist regularly creates and sells paintings as a commercial activity, the
profits will generally be taxable as business or professional income, depending
on the nature of the activity.
Section
34 of the Income-tax Act, 2025 permits deductions for expenditure incurred
wholly and exclusively for business or professional purposes, subject to the
statutory conditions. Eligible expenses may include art materials, studio rent,
assistants, framing, transportation and sales commissions. However, personal
expenses and capital expenditure are not deductible.
Artists
should also distinguish between selling an original painting and transferring
its copyright. A buyer may acquire the physical work without acquiring
the right to reproduce or commercially use its image. Where
reproduction, licensing or copyright assignment is involved, the agreement
should clearly specify the rights being transferred and the consideration
payable.
 |
| Photo courtesy Pixabay |
The
tax treatment of a gallery depends, in part, on whether it purchases artwork
for resale or sells it on behalf of an artist.
A
gallery that buys a painting for resale generally treats it as stock-in-trade. The
sale proceeds and the cost of the painting are reflected in its business
accounts, and the resulting profit contributes to the taxable business income.
Illustration: Consider a painting sold for ₹5 lakh under an
agreement allowing the gallery a 20% commission. The gallery earns ₹1 lakh,
while ₹4 lakh remains payable to the artist, before any other agreed
adjustments. In the above scenario, both the gallery and the artist would be
liable to pay tax on their respective earnings.
In
a genuine agency arrangement, the gallery ordinarily accounts for its
commission as its own revenue rather than treating the entire sale proceeds as
its income. The contract, actual conduct and accounting records must support
this treatment.
Gallery
owners should document the agreed commission, ownership of the artwork, custody
arrangements, expenses and payment deadlines. Applicable
tax-deduction-at-source obligations should also be examined.
Calling
an arrangement a consignment does not, by itself, determine its tax treatment.
For the Collector: Is a Painting a Personal Asset?
A
collector may purchase a painting purely for personal enjoyment and display it
at home for decades. That does not automatically make its eventual sale
tax-free.
Section
2(22) of the Income-tax Act, 2025 excludes paintings, drawings, sculptures and
other works of art from the personal-effects exclusion from capital assets. A
gain on resale may therefore attract capital-gains tax even when the painting
was never purchased for commercial purposes.
As
per Section 2(101) read with Section 2(67),
a painting held as a capital asset for more than 24 months will generally
qualify as a long-term capital asset. Section 197 provides a general long-term
capital gains tax rate of 12.5% without indexation, subject to applicable
provisions and the taxpayer’s circumstances.
Section
72 governs the computation of
capital gains, allowing eligible transfer expenses and acquisition and
improvement costs to be deducted. Collectors should preserve purchase
invoices, payment records and evidence of qualifying expenditure. Without
these, establishing the cost of a painting acquired many years earlier can
become difficult.
For Inheritance: Why the Original Purchase Records
Matter
An
inherited painting does not automatically attract capital-gains tax simply
because ownership passes to an heir. Under Section 70, specified transfers
under a will or gift are not treated as transfers for capital-gains purposes.
However,
a subsequent sale by the heir may attract tax. Under Section 73, the
previous owner’s acquisition cost generally remains relevant when determining
the cost of an inherited asset. The previous owner’s holding period may also
count under the applicable provisions.
For
families with art collections, preserving acquisition invoices, ownership
records and evidence of qualifying improvements can make future transfers
considerably easier.
What Every Participant in the Art Market Should
Know
Before
a painting changes hands, the parties should understand what is being sold, how
the proceeds will be treated and which records must be retained.
For
artists, this means documenting income and eligible expenses. For galleries, it
means distinguishing purchases from agency arrangements. For collectors, it
means retaining acquisition records and understanding the potential tax
consequences of resale.
In
the art market, tax treatment depends on the nature of the transaction and the
character of the holding—not simply on the price or prestige of the painting.
Disclaimer: This article is intended for
general information and educational purposes only. It does not constitute legal
or tax advice. The application of tax law depends on the facts and
circumstances of each case; readers should seek appropriate professional advice
before acting on any matter discussed here.
This Guest Post is by Subathra Mylsamy, who is a lawyer and Managing Partner at A.K. Mylsamy and Associates LLP, bringing her background in fine arts and law to the intersection of art, legal rights, taxation and ownership in India.
To contribute articles, please get in touch at artsceneinfo@gmail.com